Re: Brinkley's at it again

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Oh shit then I'm in deep Rojas, because I have a bunch o'dem stickas.



--
Crash Gordon
-------ouch------

<I feel like I'm diagonally parked in a parallel universe>
"Roland Moore" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:472f31cd$0$11526$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Despite the fact that Brinks just ordered these stickers from some
| manufacturer somewhere to have the message Brinks desired placed on the
| paper, I am sure Brinks is going to follow that same legal arguments it
has
| to date. Brinks has paid for the paper, or a paper like material, for the
| stickers as well as the printing on the stickers no less, therefore paper
| manufacturing and the printing process itself must be Brinks trade
secrets.
| Unauthorized use and placement of the stickers is therefore disclosure of
| Brinks trade secrets. Brinks never sells these stickers so possession of
| these stickers is a crime as well.
|
| "Frank Olson" <use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
message
| news:22GXi.178723$1y4.74748@xxxxxxxxxxxx
| > Roland Moore wrote:
| > >> You think I put Brinkee stickers on my own systems?
| > >
| > > I am sure you'd get hauled into court too, right behind Jim..
| >
| >
| > Only if he puts HIS phone number and contact information on them.  :-)
|
|