Re: Intresting alarm Commercail Cleveland TV

["Nick Markowitz Jr." <nick-markowitz@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Kind of figured it was a lick and stick outfit.
Oh well glad Im not in residential field.
I enjoy watching the companys that play the residential game blow each
others brains out around here.
It gets even funnier  and tragic when they think they can all of a sudden
tacle commercail and industrial.

"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:465d0cd1$0$16735$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1180495905.589999.187630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On May 29, 6:50?pm, "Mark Leuck" <m..le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> "micr0" <m...@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>>
>> news:x%U6i.4829$YM5.3758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> > got um here too. 2 way verified response, which they say is preferred
>> > by police and much better than other alarm companies. as if they are
>> > the only ones to verify!
>>
>> I don't know much about that company but we deal with a lot of 2-way
>> voice
>> installations and it is preferred by police in many cities requiring
>> verified response
>
> So how does that work?
>
> The alarm goes off, central calls the premise, and listens in. If they
> don't hear anything ....... what?  the police arent called or they are
> called ..... but they don't respond?
>
>
> Would  "mmmmelrrph!"   "mmmmelrph!"      or   "Gaaaaaahgh! "
>
> qualify as a verified alarm or response?
>
> Could be someone gagged calling for help ...... or the 2 year old who
> picked up the phone.
>
> Or mommy is bound and gagged and the 2year old picked up the phone.
>
> Or it could be Frank, without his teeth in, trying to give the code
> word.
>
> Or......................
>
> It's not 4/2 format so I doubt you'd understand :)
>
>