Re: CP-01

["Nick Markowitz Jr." <nick-markowitz@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I like the abort cancel code I have the CS follow up wth a call and still
verify  but at this point they can hold calling police unless it is some one
who is not authorised.
useful for buisnes with alot of in and outs

"Petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:l_Y_h.106237$pA6.430363@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Beau Skeen" <bskeen3@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
> 1178332080.178053.24400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> RE: I dis-like enabling cancel / abort features and don't support
>> them. A security system should be about security. I remember being in
>> a class for Caddx when a colleague had said that if you enabled
>> cancel / abort then someone with the customers arm/disarm code could
>> break in and simply enter the code. Someone replied in a smart manner
>> "If they had the code it would not matter whether or not cancel /
>> abort was enabled anyways". But I disagree, who says that if they had
>> the code the would also have a key, they would still probably not
>> break in the entry/exit zones, instead they would break in a
>> unconspicous area probably a non-entry/exit delay zone. Therefore
>> without cancel / abort they could still disarm the system, but CS
>> would still call to verify the alarm and they probably would not have
>> the password.
>>
>> Any Thoughts?
>> I know its this very particular, but I still think its applicable.
>>
>
> I don't know about the USA,but here,most of the time burglar just hit the
> front door and use the delay to make a razia in the home and leave in less
> then 2 minute,they don't care about the noise cause for a better part of
> the year no one would hear a thing,all our windows and door are closed
> cause of the cold...
>
> and the fact that we listen to Celine Dion at high level all the time
> doesn't help either  ;-)
>
>
>
>