Re: CP-01

["Petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Beau Skeen" <bskeen3@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
1178332080.178053.24400@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> RE: I dis-like enabling cancel / abort features and don't support
> them. A security system should be about security. I remember being in
> a class for Caddx when a colleague had said that if you enabled
> cancel / abort then someone with the customers arm/disarm code could
> break in and simply enter the code. Someone replied in a smart manner
> "If they had the code it would not matter whether or not cancel /
> abort was enabled anyways". But I disagree, who says that if they had
> the code the would also have a key, they would still probably not
> break in the entry/exit zones, instead they would break in a
> unconspicous area probably a non-entry/exit delay zone. Therefore
> without cancel / abort they could still disarm the system, but CS
> would still call to verify the alarm and they probably would not have
> the password.
>
> Any Thoughts?
> I know its this very particular, but I still think its applicable.
>

I don't know about the USA,but here,most of the time burglar just hit the
front door and use the delay to make a razia in the home and leave in less
then 2 minute,they don't care about the noise cause for a better part of the
year no one would hear a thing,all our windows and door are closed cause of
the cold...

and the fact that we listen to Celine Dion at high level all the time
doesn't help either  ;-)