Re: CP-01

[Beau Skeen <bskeen3@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On May 4, 9:30 am, "Crash Gordon" <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> OH yeah and I FORGOT this one...
>
> Even if you have CP-01 features enabled and the digital signal to CS is
> delayed BUT you have Uplink (or any other) radio tripping off the siren
> voltage...guess what...yah...NO delay of sig to CS.
>
> "Crash Gordon" <webmas...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:4639452c$0$10299$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | This thing's a PITA.
> |
> | Clients HATE the exit beeping.
> | I HATE the delayed signal...I get weird restorals with no alarm...it's
> | STOOPID.
> | Clients are confused because we don't call if they shutdown before the 30
> | sec. so they think we are idiots because we didn't get the signal.
> |
> | I may just stop using the CP-01 option if this keeps up...let the Sheriff
> | come get me, I'm not gonna lose clients over this.
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |

RE: I dis-like enabling cancel / abort features and don't support
them. A security system should be about security. I remember being in
a class for Caddx when a colleague had said that if you enabled
cancel / abort then someone with the customers arm/disarm code could
break in and simply enter the code. Someone replied in a smart manner
"If they had the code it would not matter whether or not cancel /
abort was enabled anyways". But I disagree, who says that if they had
the code the would also have a key, they would still probably not
break in the entry/exit zones, instead they would break in a
unconspicous area probably a non-entry/exit delay zone. Therefore
without cancel / abort they could still disarm the system, but CS
would still call to verify the alarm and they probably would not have
the password.

Any Thoughts?
I know its this very particular, but I still think its applicable.