Re: Intresting alarm Commercail Cleveland TV

[Jim <alarminex@xxxxxxx>]

On May 30, 12:34=EF=BF=BDam, "Mark Leuck" <m..le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "Jim" <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:1180495905.589999.187630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On May 29, 6:50?pm, "Mark Leuck" <m..le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > "micr0" <m...@xxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> >news:x%U6i.4829$YM5.3758@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> > > got um here too. 2 way verified response, which they say is preferred
> > > by police and much better than other alarm companies. as if they are
> > > the only ones to verify!
>
> > I don't know much about that company but we deal with a lot of 2-way vo=
ice
> > installations and it is preferred by police in many cities requiring
> > verified response
>
> So how does that work?
>
> The alarm goes off, central calls the premise, and listens in. If they
> don't hear anything ....... what? =A0the police arent called or they are
> called ..... but they don't respond?
>
> Would =A0"mmmmelrrph!" =A0 "mmmmelrph!" =A0 =A0 =A0or =A0 "Gaaaaaahgh! "
>
> qualify as a verified alarm or response?
>
> Could be someone gagged calling for help ...... or the 2 year old who
> picked up the phone.
>
> Or mommy is bound and gagged and the 2year old picked up the phone.
>
> Or it could be Frank, without his teeth in, trying to give the code
> word.
>
> Or......................
>
> It's not 4/2 format so I doubt you'd understand :)

The fact that you can do nothing but doubt, is understandable.