[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rough estimate for...

Subject: Re: Rough estimate for...
From: "Buggs" <thatsallfolksl@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:42:46 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <0v6dnTDS2sDRUQrbnZ2dnUVZ_hSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4697f93e$0$3577$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f_Gdnc7hCqzWgAXbnZ2dnUVZ_ragnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <2kZli.7391$Od7.933@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Russell Brill wrote:
>> Could you elaborate on that?
> Yeah, He means they "SUCK", A.K.A. Don't work well, perform poorly,
> etc. etc...

:-)
js

References:
- Rough estimate for...
  - From: BlueTape
- Re: Rough estimate for...
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Rough estimate for...
  - From: BlueTape
- Re: Rough estimate for...
  - From: Russell Brill

Prev by Message: Re: Major shortcoming in Paradox new panel lineup
Next by Message: Re: Major shortcoming in Paradox new panel lineup
Previous by thread: Re: Rough estimate for...
Next by thread: Re: Rough estimate for...
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home