Re: No Serial Ports on Notebooks

["Petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx>]

I just dont get it..whats the buzz with 8 door controler...why do you like
to put all your eggs in the same damn basket?

but if you really need 8 door controler to please you....

here is some thing you can do,use 4 kt300 in one consourseEXP enclosure
http://www.dsc.com/Default.aspx?id=50

you will have one box wich is 28 X 14 for you 8 door..just order the 4 pc
board 4 battery and 4 transfo...

unless you cant figure this out...




"Roland More" <NoSpamroland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
468e5511$0$12251$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I never understood the Corporate Edition name when Kantech doesn't even
>make an 8 door panel (that I have ever seen). Some corporate.
> Does Kantech believe someone would actually pick over the counter Kantach
> as a first choice for a large corporate environment just to mount walls
> full of 2 door panels? Even Keyscan has an eight door panel.
>
> "Petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:MR3ji.8040$HP3.5206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ever heard of Microsoft virtual pc?
>>
>> Been able to use an Old Kl8000 database from kantech in a set-up that
>> consisted of 3 virtual Dos 6.22 machine,they were all connected together
>> with simulatation of rs232 port that were in software and the connection
>> to the hardware controller was redirected to a USB serial port..
>>
>> all was well and it worked for hours at a time..
>>
>> this was to help transfer the info from the old software to the Entrpass
>> Corporate edition...
>>
>>
>> "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message
>> de news: 468afcff$0$514$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> thats why i still have a 486 running dos...so i can still RAM old radx
>>> stuff.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:468af79a$0$20555$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> |
>>> | "The Computer Dood" <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> | news:ZLAii.470827$JN6.385673@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> |
>>> | > I have had the same problem, but with Desktops.  You are correct,
>>> that
>>> | > the hardware emulation does not always do the trick...but what does
>>> that
>>> | > say for us hanging on to "OLD" software.  In my Software Engineering
>>> | > classes, we talked about "Life Cycle" of software.  How long should
>>> it
>>> | > be maintained, and how long should it run before it is rightfully
>>> | > retired.
>>> |
>>> | It's not a question of retiring, sometimes you have no choice
>>> especially
>>> | with discontinued panels like Linear CP-90's, AT&T and old Caddx
>>> panels,
>>> | that software is DOS only
>>> |
>>> |
>>> | I guess the moral is that they built stuff too good back then.
>>> | >   What is it you are using that uses DOS anymore?  I used to program
>>> | > industrial devices with RS-232 controls, back in the early 1980's.
>>> So
>>> | > here we are 20 years later, still clinging to RS232 devices?  Now I
>>> buy
>>> | > networked (TCP/IP) devices.  The speed difference (156K vs 10Mb)
>>> between
>>> | > network devices and RS232 Serial is astronomical.  So what is it you
>>> are
>>> | > using DOS for????????????  It is not even "DOS" anymore, but the
>>> command
>>> | > shell.
>>> |
>>> | Security system technology still resides somewhere in the 80's
>>> |
>>> |
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>