Re: AC Smoke interconnection

[Frank Olson <Use-the-email-links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Robert L Bass wrote:

>>    "it's amazing anyone would even suggest
>>     it, especially a state official who ought to know
>>     better".
>>
>> You lie Mr. BAss, you lie.
>
> Oh, really?  Which is it then?  You're not a state official or you don't
> know better?

The fact is that you don't know the relevant code(s), don't install for
a living, and denigrate those individuals who do (know the code *and*
install for a living).


>
>> I did not recommend or suggest anything......
>> I wrote "The only one I know of" .
>
> That is not *all* you wrote.  Google is your enemy.
> Here's what you said:
>
>> "The only one I know of, that is a complete
>> UL approved unit, is the Gentex 9120F 120
>> vac/9vdc Photoelectric smoke alarm with piezo.
>> It has a pair of wires for an external alarm system."
>
> The implication was that the unit is UL
> approved for the purpose.  You even
> stated that the unit has wires "for an
> external alarm system."
>
> Of course, you were completely wrong.  The unit
> is not designed or listed for use with an alarm
> system.
>
> So please explain what the lie was.  We all know
> that you are a state official.  We all now know that
> you didn't know the facts.  From the way you
> type my name we also know that you have the
> social development of a 9-year old.  It truly is
> amazing that a state official could be so immature,
> so totally lacking in knowledge and so incredibly
> dishonest.
>
> Well, no.  I take that back.  It's not at all surprising
> that a state official is so dishonest.  Your immaturity
> and stupidity, however, are a bit beyond the norm.
>

And once again you've planted both feet well into your mouth.  I would
suggest you re-visit the relevant code, in this case NFPA 72-2002
11.7.6.7.  I also think that you owe Norm and some others an apology,
but past experience has shown that "common decency" and "honor" aren't
words you even recognize.