Re: the police was dispatched to ... the wrong house

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Robert L Bass" <RobertLBass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eOsti.339$MT3.258@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > If they do, the worst thing the CS can do is
> > send the cops to the old address.  I realize
> > this is confusing to you but try real hard and
> > perhaps it will become clear (or at least not
> > entirely blurry) to you."
>
> Let me try it again with emphgasis:  *If* the
> panel has been rel;ocated, *then* the worst
> thing the CS can do is send the police to the
> old address.

It's the only thing they can do other than nothing, they have no way of
knowing if the panel is NOT at the old location, they have no way of knowing
the customer didn't just change phone numbers, they are not there to
investigate where a customer's panel is they are to dispatch when that alarm
panel sends a signal

 > > The only thing I can think of is that you
> > misunderstood the conversation.
>
> I understood the conversation.  The point is,
> if the panel is no longer at 499 Casino Ave,
> in Cranford but now resides at 91 Pine Ave
> in Garwood, the worst thing the central station
> can do is send the cops to Casino Ave.
>
> Do you disagree?

Yes because last I checked Caller ID did not also transmit addresses and
therefore they would now know the panel was no longer at 499 Casino Ave.