Re: I NEED INFORMATION ABOUT ADT AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS

["Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx>]

There are very good reasons to provide line seizure and correctly wire a
RJ31X or RJ38X, but is there an FCC requirement to provide line seizure?. I
doubt it.

Doug

--

"Nick Lawrence" <nlaw@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:d11cb$46b20608$43bca3f1$31868@xxxxxxxxxxxx

>
> This is a very good reason for RJ31X jacks to be wired properly (not
> hotwired as many peel-n-stick mass marketers do), and readily accessible
> to subscribers.
>
> Nick Lawrence
> Berkeley, CA
>
>
> MNewman77@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> I'm under the impression that my ADT system was hooked up in violation
>> of federal law and need information on whether or not it is illegal
>> for the system to be hooked up simply to a line inside the house, and
>> not the outside line to allow line seizure.
>>
>> ADT hooked up my system and never mentioned anything about it being
>> hooked up incorrectly.  When I tried to cancel on those grounds, they
>> refused to waive my de-activation fee and stated that I was still
>> under contract with them even though I signed a contract for a 100%
>> operable system.
>>
>> They offered to fix it and credit my account for a few months, but I
>> can't trust them knowing that if something had happened, my wife and
>> child could have been hurt.
>>
>> If I knew where to find the federal statute, I would really have a
>> case.
>>
>> Can anybody help?
>>
>> Please email Fivebucs@xxxxxxxxxxx with any information you can help
>> with.  Thanks!
>>