Re: Is low-priced Internet monitoring reliable?

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

If there is I've not figured it out, or even heard of anyone doing so in the
10+ years I've been using DMP.


"Bob La Londe" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4500c8f4$0$19608$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| "Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:45005ef6$0$34076$815e3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >A hack for what?
|
| Installer code.
|
|
| > "Bob La Londe" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:44ffbc65$0$19703$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| > |
| > | "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > |
| > | Only if they shell out for the modem, but they are darned easy to
| > program
| > at
| > | the keypad.  There is also a hack.  A DMP rep mentioned it to me, but
I
| > have
| > | no clue what it is.
| > |
| > | >
| > | >
| > | >> I would imagine that similarly on the Central Station side they
would
| > | >> only need to set up and assign an account number (along with
billing
| > | >> and address details) and perhaps download the panel info for
| > | >> reference.
| > | >
| > | > And how many companies can monitor anything from DMP?
| > |
| > | They send CID just fine to any decent receive.  I've got about 50 of
| > them
| > | on-line.  Half are CID on my lines, and half are DMP format on CS
lines.
| > | Both work just fine.
| > |
| > | >
| > | >> Of course, the Central Station would need to physically support DMP
| > | >> panels, including (Internet) network connectivity.
| > | >>
| > |
| > | Ah, there is the rub.  Interent connectivity is fairly proprietary, I
| > know
| > | Napco's is.  Still a decent CS should atleast be considering it.
| > |
| > | --
| > | Bob La Londe
| > | Fishing Arizona & The Colorado River
| > | Fishing Forums & Contests
| > | http://www.YumaBassMan.com
| > |
| > |
| > |
| > | --
| > | Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
| > |
| >
| >
|
|
|
| --
| Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|