Re: New ADT Homeland Security Program

["Petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx>]

Holy Shit....I am damn sure a man in Ottawa wont like this....
And he sure didn't deserve that.....

Roland I hope you were not in your "normal" state of mind when you wrote
that...




"Roland Moore" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
hNIYg.105655$5o5.85600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> If you couldn't figure out it was a joke in less than 1 second then I am
> glad you live where you live and not here. Let me see "shallow and
> insanely stupid"? Yes, your post certainly qualifies for that distinction!
> Do you know your own IQ score by the way? Good enough to get into any ivy
> league school I suspect. Do share it with us so we have something to gauge
> the merit of your other observations by. Do you read 10 to 15 books a
> month? What topics do you prefer? Economics? A heavy philosophical
> treatise? What tomes have pleased you most recently? Do tell all! Please
> let us know where you received your MBA (or equivalent in your country and
> where it was from). What was your GPA and position in your class? I am
> sure you are proud of that and would be eager to share it with us. And I
> missed where you learned how to pilot a jet. Not a pilot? Too bad! I
> suspect perhaps you have a future as a pilot, probably the hot air type of
> some sort. Of course the above is a brief contrast of you and of the
> things George W. Bush does or has done. If he is at or near the bottom of
> the intellectual food chain in your view, where are you? In American
> Baseball, something George W. Bush knows something about too, you would be
> playing the position they call "left out" I believe. However if you do
> come visit us here in the USA someday I hope you can drive here from where
> you are. We have an extra passanger that posts here that would be right at
> home with you on your little yellow bus on your way back. You may need a
> come along (perhaps called a lever hoist where you are from) and a "A"
> frame to help him and you remove the respective feet from your mouths. Be
> forewarned that some folks that post here want to donate their foot for
> his other end and a foot for yours too perhaps if you have any other
> similar observations to make in the future.
> If you think these comments a bit harsh, you should be thankful that this
> might be WW III coming and not WW I again. Here is a breif U.S. History
> lesson for foreigners to see where a little political criticism in the USA
> can get you if said at the wrong time. Let's see what happened to some
> folks (some of whom I suspect are your heroes) after the Espionage Act was
> passed by Congress in 1917.
> Eugene Victor Debs. (by the way a good Democrat in the Indiana Legislature
> and socialist - perhaps that is a redundant statement) sentenced to 10
> years for one speech no less, unfortunately he served only 3.
> William Dudley Haywood. Big socialist publisher, but he got that eye for
> an eye thing confused. He got 20 years but fled to Russia. Died there too.
> What a guy! Go and be near Joe Stalin. That says it all.
> Asa Philip Randolph. A man who apparently thought being black should
> exclude one from national service and said so. Clink.
> Victor Berger. He probably got the worst sentence of them all. Bypassed
> jail and got elected to Congress while out on appeal. And worst of all got
> a pardon from a Republican President. (Read on it really starts to go down
> hill from here)
> John Reed. Wrote a lot (The Masses) and sounds just like you do in your
> post. Here is a taste (below) to see if that doesn't fit your world view.
> "No recent words have seemed to me so ludicrously condescending as the
> Kaiser's speech to his people when he said that in this supreme crisis he
> freely forgave all those who had ever opposed him. I am ashamed that in
> this day in a civilized country any one can speak such archaic nonsense as
> that speech contained.
> More nauseating than the crack-brained bombast of the Kaiser is the
> editorial chorus in America which pretends to believe - would have us
> believe - that the White and Spotless Knight of Modern Democracy is
> marching against the Unspeakably Vile Monster of Medieval Militarism.
> What has democracy to do in alliance with Nicholas, the Tsar? It is
> Liberalism which is marching from the Petersburg of Father Gapon, from the
> Odessa of Progroms? Are our editors naive enough to believe this?
> We, who are Socialists, must hope - we may even expect - that out of this
> horror of bloodshed and dire destruction will come far-reaching social
> changes - and a long step forward towards our goal of peace among men. But
> we must not be duped by this editorial buncombe about Liberalism going
> forth to Holy War against Tyranny. This is not our war."
> John Reed died young of Typus. Like most liberals and socialist he wrote a
> lot but learned nothing, especially about Ectoparasites. What should I say
> about rats and fleas, no too easy. Let's say stupidity is its own reward
> and he certainly got his.
> Max Eastman. He just published critical articles in The Masses. Hung jurry
> after two trials. I bet that left him broke. It must have broken something
> in him too because he went from left to right. He went to work for the
> Reader's Digest and then supported Joe McCarthy! I can't tell which is
> worse.
> Emma Goldman. The world owed her and everyone else a living. She decided
> that the unemployed should steal the food they needed. Talk about family
> values she was promoting free love and birth control way before the '60s.
> Here She simply opposed conscription, and only got two years for that. In
> the end of her life special permission had to be obtained to bring her
> carcass to back to the USA to be buried.
> Emma Goldman lamented in her autobiography that there were about 100 folks
> that were cought up with her in the trial and destroyed. Many for just
> handing out tracts. Up to 10,000 were eventually hauled off to jail or
> deported by J. Edgar or the rest of the FBI boys that followed his pink
> panties. Funny but major portions of the Espionage Act remain part of
> United States law (18 USC 793, 794). The best part is that a Democratic
> President, Woodrow Wilson, was the big push behind it all and was proud of
> it!
> (Picture Bob Newhart in a one way conversation for a moment here) Wait a
> minute. Wait! Yes! I think someone just spilled their Kool-Aid again. No
> he's choking. I can't tell is it grape flavor or is he turning blue? Man
> he spit it all over everything! This is ugly! He's down on the floor
> snapping at flies. He looks like a cold tuna bouncing around on a hot
> deck. Wait. wait.... he is saying something Help maybe? no, no, He is
> saying ..It? yes, "it"... get his hand away from his throat It. It what?
> It.. It  Yes "It" we understand. It can't.. Yes we understand! "It can't"
> He's gurgling something, I think it's be true. Yes "be true"  Oh, "It
> can't be true". "Oh yes, positively true!" "No, no sorry no Fox news to
> blame." "No, I promise there was no Fox news." "Yes." "Yes the BBC
> reported about it eventually when it came into being."  "No, no Fox news!"
> "Yes I am sure Rupert Murdock wasn't born yet." "Yes, I am sure Wilson was
> a Democrat." "Yes big 'D' Democrat as in not Republican" "Yes Democrat,
> Yes all Wilson's idea start to finish" "Yes the Supreme Court Upheld it."
> "Yes it upheld it, Yes, yes in 1919" "No. no take the gun out of your
> mouth and calm down." "Yes, it was all in Emma's autobiography." "Stop
> screaming" 'TAKE ME NOW'!" "Here, breathe into the paper bag, you'll be
> fine." "Okay we will talk about Thorstein Veblen if that will make you
> feel better."(Okay turn off Bob Newhart)
>
> To see feeble posts like yours parroting off the cuff political remarks
> truly reflects a barbaric level of stupidity on your part. No I don't hope
> you will get it eventually get it because you've identified with a group
> of folks that make it a practice not to get anything that might in some
> way help the other side. It really doesn't matter to me whether you bury
> your snout in the trough on the left or the one on the right. Unless you
> take the time and trouble to find the truth for yourself it is all the
> same swill. It all looks the same, tastes the same and stinks the same,
> and you and some others here are apparently happy eating all they can get.
> Try to break you lazzy ass away from the trough long enough to come up for
> some fresh air. My point is simple. This whole situation fighting terror
> might be on a real downturn before it sees an upside. Drive by comments
> like yours when flag draped coffins are coming home are not appreciated by
> everyone. If the level of toleration gets too thin, and the past says
> anything about the future, who knows what measures, legal or otherwise,
> comments like yours may provoke. Again, attitudes like yours might be the
> cool thing to have in your neck of the woods, (you and others that post
> similar drivel have already proven beyond any doubt not to be bright
> enough to come up with them or much of anything else on your own), but
> they aren't universally appreciated here in this country. I feel certain
> all sides of this issue will be surprised, for all of us that may still be
> around in 30 or so years, to see how the History Channel tells us the
> current events really unfolded behind the scenes. Until then, unless you
> have loved ones in harms way or soon could have, a word to the wise says
> to be more reflective and circumspect in your future posts. I doubt this
> post will mean much too you. You'll probably dive right back into the
> swill so deeply the last thing anyone one will see or hear from you is
> your curly brushy tail going under and a big "Oink" bubble coming up. What
> a legacy!
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "tourman" <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1160954663.731248.235000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>I don't normally comment about other country's politics, but this has
>> got to be one of the Bush administration's most shallow and insanely
>> stupid ideas. At first I thought it was all a joke, but then I saw it
>> might actually be a fact....or is is ?....surely not...
>>
>> What will this guy think of next.....
>>
>> RHC
>>
>> G. Morgan wrote:
>>> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:44:20 -0400, J.
>>> <jsloud2001<removeme>@netscape.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> >Thought you guys might like to know about this...
>>> >
>>> >http://www.thebluebrick.net/ADT.html
>>>
>>>
>>> LOL... That would not surprise me...
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> -Graham
>>> (remove the double e's to email)
>>
>
>