[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: New ADT Homeland Security Program



I don't like or dislike it. I gave up reading it after the first couple
of lines since it has nothing to do with security. Political or
religious discussions bring out the strongest feelings from a lot of
people. But it's exactly the reason I try to stay out of other
country's political discussions.

I'm glad it was a joke. I wouldn't think that ADT would want their
signs misused that way.

RHC

Petem wrote:
> Holy Shit....I am damn sure a man in Ottawa wont like this....
> And he sure didn't deserve that.....
>
> Roland I hope you were not in your "normal" state of mind when you wrote
> that...
>
>
>
>
> "Roland Moore" <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a =E9crit dans le message de news:
> hNIYg.105655$5o5.85600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > If you couldn't figure out it was a joke in less than 1 second then I am
> > glad you live where you live and not here. Let me see "shallow and
> > insanely stupid"? Yes, your post certainly qualifies for that distincti=
on!
> > Do you know your own IQ score by the way? Good enough to get into any i=
vy
> > league school I suspect. Do share it with us so we have something to ga=
uge
> > the merit of your other observations by. Do you read 10 to 15 books a
> > month? What topics do you prefer? Economics? A heavy philosophical
> > treatise? What tomes have pleased you most recently? Do tell all! Please
> > let us know where you received your MBA (or equivalent in your country =
and
> > where it was from). What was your GPA and position in your class? I am
> > sure you are proud of that and would be eager to share it with us. And I
> > missed where you learned how to pilot a jet. Not a pilot? Too bad! I
> > suspect perhaps you have a future as a pilot, probably the hot air type=
 of
> > some sort. Of course the above is a brief contrast of you and of the
> > things George W. Bush does or has done. If he is at or near the bottom =
of
> > the intellectual food chain in your view, where are you? In American
> > Baseball, something George W. Bush knows something about too, you would=
 be
> > playing the position they call "left out" I believe. However if you do
> > come visit us here in the USA someday I hope you can drive here from wh=
ere
> > you are. We have an extra passanger that posts here that would be right=
 at
> > home with you on your little yellow bus on your way back. You may need a
> > come along (perhaps called a lever hoist where you are from) and a "A"
> > frame to help him and you remove the respective feet from your mouths. =
Be
> > forewarned that some folks that post here want to donate their foot for
> > his other end and a foot for yours too perhaps if you have any other
> > similar observations to make in the future.
> > If you think these comments a bit harsh, you should be thankful that th=
is
> > might be WW III coming and not WW I again. Here is a breif U.S. History
> > lesson for foreigners to see where a little political criticism in the =
USA
> > can get you if said at the wrong time. Let's see what happened to some
> > folks (some of whom I suspect are your heroes) after the Espionage Act =
was
> > passed by Congress in 1917.
> > Eugene Victor Debs. (by the way a good Democrat in the Indiana Legislat=
ure
> > and socialist - perhaps that is a redundant statement) sentenced to 10
> > years for one speech no less, unfortunately he served only 3.
> > William Dudley Haywood. Big socialist publisher, but he got that eye for
> > an eye thing confused. He got 20 years but fled to Russia. Died there t=
oo.
> > What a guy! Go and be near Joe Stalin. That says it all.
> > Asa Philip Randolph. A man who apparently thought being black should
> > exclude one from national service and said so. Clink.
> > Victor Berger. He probably got the worst sentence of them all. Bypassed
> > jail and got elected to Congress while out on appeal. And worst of all =
got
> > a pardon from a Republican President. (Read on it really starts to go d=
own
> > hill from here)
> > John Reed. Wrote a lot (The Masses) and sounds just like you do in your
> > post. Here is a taste (below) to see if that doesn't fit your world vie=
w=2E
> > "No recent words have seemed to me so ludicrously condescending as the
> > Kaiser's speech to his people when he said that in this supreme crisis =
he
> > freely forgave all those who had ever opposed him. I am ashamed that in
> > this day in a civilized country any one can speak such archaic nonsense=
 as
> > that speech contained.
> > More nauseating than the crack-brained bombast of the Kaiser is the
> > editorial chorus in America which pretends to believe - would have us
> > believe - that the White and Spotless Knight of Modern Democracy is
> > marching against the Unspeakably Vile Monster of Medieval Militarism.
> > What has democracy to do in alliance with Nicholas, the Tsar? It is
> > Liberalism which is marching from the Petersburg of Father Gapon, from =
the
> > Odessa of Progroms? Are our editors naive enough to believe this?
> > We, who are Socialists, must hope - we may even expect - that out of th=
is
> > horror of bloodshed and dire destruction will come far-reaching social
> > changes - and a long step forward towards our goal of peace among men. =
But
> > we must not be duped by this editorial buncombe about Liberalism going
> > forth to Holy War against Tyranny. This is not our war."
> > John Reed died young of Typus. Like most liberals and socialist he wrot=
e a
> > lot but learned nothing, especially about Ectoparasites. What should I =
say
> > about rats and fleas, no too easy. Let's say stupidity is its own reward
> > and he certainly got his.
> > Max Eastman. He just published critical articles in The Masses. Hung ju=
rry
> > after two trials. I bet that left him broke. It must have broken someth=
ing
> > in him too because he went from left to right. He went to work for the
> > Reader's Digest and then supported Joe McCarthy! I can't tell which is
> > worse.
> > Emma Goldman. The world owed her and everyone else a living. She decided
> > that the unemployed should steal the food they needed. Talk about family
> > values she was promoting free love and birth control way before the '60=
s=2E
> > Here She simply opposed conscription, and only got two years for that. =
In
> > the end of her life special permission had to be obtained to bring her
> > carcass to back to the USA to be buried.
> > Emma Goldman lamented in her autobiography that there were about 100 fo=
lks
> > that were cought up with her in the trial and destroyed. Many for just
> > handing out tracts. Up to 10,000 were eventually hauled off to jail or
> > deported by J. Edgar or the rest of the FBI boys that followed his pink
> > panties. Funny but major portions of the Espionage Act remain part of
> > United States law (18 USC 793, 794). The best part is that a Democratic
> > President, Woodrow Wilson, was the big push behind it all and was proud=
 of
> > it!
> > (Picture Bob Newhart in a one way conversation for a moment here) Wait a
> > minute. Wait! Yes! I think someone just spilled their Kool-Aid again. No
> > he's choking. I can't tell is it grape flavor or is he turning blue? Man
> > he spit it all over everything! This is ugly! He's down on the floor
> > snapping at flies. He looks like a cold tuna bouncing around on a hot
> > deck. Wait. wait.... he is saying something Help maybe? no, no, He is
> > saying ..It? yes, "it"... get his hand away from his throat It. It what?
> > It.. It  Yes "It" we understand. It can't.. Yes we understand! "It can'=
t"
> > He's gurgling something, I think it's be true. Yes "be true"  Oh, "It
> > can't be true". "Oh yes, positively true!" "No, no sorry no Fox news to
> > blame." "No, I promise there was no Fox news." "Yes." "Yes the BBC
> > reported about it eventually when it came into being."  "No, no Fox new=
s!"
> > "Yes I am sure Rupert Murdock wasn't born yet." "Yes, I am sure Wilson =
was
> > a Democrat." "Yes big 'D' Democrat as in not Republican" "Yes Democrat,
> > Yes all Wilson's idea start to finish" "Yes the Supreme Court Upheld it=
."
> > "Yes it upheld it, Yes, yes in 1919" "No. no take the gun out of your
> > mouth and calm down." "Yes, it was all in Emma's autobiography." "Stop
> > screaming" 'TAKE ME NOW'!" "Here, breathe into the paper bag, you'll be
> > fine." "Okay we will talk about Thorstein Veblen if that will make you
> > feel better."(Okay turn off Bob Newhart)
> >
> > To see feeble posts like yours parroting off the cuff political remarks
> > truly reflects a barbaric level of stupidity on your part. No I don't h=
ope
> > you will get it eventually get it because you've identified with a group
> > of folks that make it a practice not to get anything that might in some
> > way help the other side. It really doesn't matter to me whether you bury
> > your snout in the trough on the left or the one on the right. Unless you
> > take the time and trouble to find the truth for yourself it is all the
> > same swill. It all looks the same, tastes the same and stinks the same,
> > and you and some others here are apparently happy eating all they can g=
et.
> > Try to break you lazzy ass away from the trough long enough to come up =
for
> > some fresh air. My point is simple. This whole situation fighting terror
> > might be on a real downturn before it sees an upside. Drive by comments
> > like yours when flag draped coffins are coming home are not appreciated=
 by
> > everyone. If the level of toleration gets too thin, and the past says
> > anything about the future, who knows what measures, legal or otherwise,
> > comments like yours may provoke. Again, attitudes like yours might be t=
he
> > cool thing to have in your neck of the woods, (you and others that post
> > similar drivel have already proven beyond any doubt not to be bright
> > enough to come up with them or much of anything else on your own), but
> > they aren't universally appreciated here in this country. I feel certain
> > all sides of this issue will be surprised, for all of us that may still=
 be
> > around in 30 or so years, to see how the History Channel tells us the
> > current events really unfolded behind the scenes. Until then, unless you
> > have loved ones in harms way or soon could have, a word to the wise says
> > to be more reflective and circumspect in your future posts. I doubt this
> > post will mean much too you. You'll probably dive right back into the
> > swill so deeply the last thing anyone one will see or hear from you is
> > your curly brushy tail going under and a big "Oink" bubble coming up. W=
hat
> > a legacy!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "tourman" <robercampbell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:1160954663.731248.235000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>I don't normally comment about other country's politics, but this has
> >> got to be one of the Bush administration's most shallow and insanely
> >> stupid ideas. At first I thought it was all a joke, but then I saw it
> >> might actually be a fact....or is is ?....surely not...
> >>
> >> What will this guy think of next.....
> >>
> >> RHC
> >>
> >> G. Morgan wrote:
> >>> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 20:44:20 -0400, J.
> >>> <jsloud2001<removeme>@netscape.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >Thought you guys might like to know about this...
> >>> >
> >>> >http://www.thebluebrick.net/ADT.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> LOL... That would not surprise me...
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> -Graham
> >>> (remove the double e's to email)
> >>
> >
> >



alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home