[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: notifier verifire softwarw

Subject: Re: notifier verifire softwarw
From: J. <jsloud2001<removeme>@netscape.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2006 09:17:04 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1160135614.184788.176330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <TgvVg.105235$R63.45215@pd7urf1no> <1160162873.617032.56630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 6 Oct 2006 12:27:53 -0700, "jewellfish" <jewellfish@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>
>You think Ford should have the right to tell you that you HAVE to go to
>the dealer??
>
>The whole dealer-proprietary concept is a pile of horsefeathers!
>

Ford can't do that because of the Magnuson Moss Warranty Ac of 1975.
Otherwise, they probably would.  The MM Act may have some relevance to
proprietary FA panel service.  I wonder if it's ever been challenged
in court.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: notifier verifire softwarw
  - From: Doug
- Re: notifier verifire softwarw
  - From: Roland Moore
- Re: notifier verifire softwarw
  - From: Robert L Bass

References:
- notifier verifire softwarw
  - From: jewellfish
- Re: notifier verifire softwarw
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: notifier verifire softwarw
  - From: jewellfish

Prev by Message: Re: notifier verifire softwarw
Next by Message: Re: How many service techs?
Previous by thread: Re: notifier verifire softwarw
Next by thread: Re: notifier verifire softwarw
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home