Re: pir false alarms

[Matt Ion <soundy106@xxxxxxxxx>]

Jim wrote:
>
>
>>Far be it from me to jump to Bass's defence, but Jim, you're just being an ass.
>
>
> Matt, you're absoluetly right.
>
> Let it be far FAR from you to jump to this fucking assholes defense.
>
> As far as me  acting like an ass, I think that has already been
> determined.
> If  you've got any issues with what I do, you'd damn well better have
> issues with
> that fat dying son of a bitch too who has acted like an asshole in
> Usenet for years
> and consider why I treat him like the picece of shit he is.
>
> You might also consider that there was no reason for him to post his
> picayune
> comments in response to my well intentioned post to begin with and
> likewise
> the same goes for  you.
>
>
> Oh yes, I almost forgot to mention. You don't run things here. If you
> don't like what goes on
> here, you're welcome to leave. You're also welcome to thank Bass for
> that attitude too.
> If he can fuck up this Newsgroup, so can anyone ................ aint
> that a bitch...........
>
>
>>Bass is correct: with three different sensors falsing, unless they're all
>>mounted very close together, a change of window coverings, HVAC system, etc.
>>are, in fact, are not a LIKELY cause.
>>
>>Possible, yes; likely, no.  That's all he said.
>
>
>
> Consider Matt .................... that all I was saying is that if the
> OP changed window
> coverings in his home ........... HIS ENTIRE HOME .............. why
> wouldn't it be likely,
> possible, plausable,  reasonable, conceivable to think that all three
> motion
>  detectors, maybe, might, could be, would be............... affected?
>
> GET IT?
>
>
>
>>>>Given the information available, the most likely cause would be a bad panel or a bad RF
>>>>receiver (if the detectors happen to be wireless).
>>>
>>>
>>>What an idiot you are.
>>>
>>>If it was the panel or a reciever ......tell us ...... why is it that
>>>the dual tech motions cured the problem?
>>
>>We don't know that they've CURED the problem... they may have simply masked a
>>symptom.  From the OP's story, we don't evne know how long they've been in, let
>>alone how long they'll keep working properly, or if the problem will re-appear.
>
>
> Yeah .... for all we know in 5 or 10 years, it could show up again ....
> or even tomorrow.
> But that has no bearing, what-so-ever on the fact that changing the
> detectors wouldn't
> have made any difference if there was a bad receiver or panel.
> GET IT?
>
>
> Jeeeeeeze, Matt,  If you're going to pick something to defend, that the
> asshole said, at least
> pick something plausable. I didn't see you defending his erroneous
> postulation that
> a PIR will not trip if the air temperature within it's range changes
> rapidly.

Feel better now?

Or are you trying to give yourself a stroke?