Re: Ademco Panels?

[Mike Sokoly <secure15@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

BLOW ME YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE!

Nomen Nescio wrote:
> Mike Sokoly said:
>
>
>>>I think it would be a little silly to have rolling codes for door/window
>>>transmitters, since there's no way to resync them without a service call.
>>
>>Bullshit- GE's stuff works fine
>
>
> It's my understanding that only the keyfobs use rolling codes -- ELM, as GE
> calls it.  However, I don't use ITI/GE wireless, so I may be mistaken.
>
>
>>>Plus, rolling codes don't appreciably increase the security of sensors,
>>>since an intruder's problem is to block the legitimate alarm signal from
>>>reaching the receiver, not to transmit the correct  disarm signal.
>>
>>Who's opinion? Yours, documented or proven by yourself?
>
>
> Even Bass has figured this one out. You should be embarrassed.   Rolling
> codes are intended to prevent someone from disarming the system by
> transmitting the correct serial number/code.  If I tell you that the
> wireless transmitter for a certain house is #012345, please tell us how
> transmitting that serial number will defeat the system.
>
>
>>Guess again smartass- I've seen it done by perps with a "Board" full of
>>deivces that they drive thru neighborhoods with.
>
>
> You've "seen it done?"  You ride around neighborhoods with perps?
>
> A burglar would have to know what brand of system is in use.  He would then
> have to know that the system is configured for wireless keyfobs.  He would
> then need to identify which wireless signal is the disarm signal, and
> determine that it is not a rolling code system.  Then, he'd need to have
> the equipment to transmit that particular code.  Not entirely beyond the
> realm of possibility, but not very damn likely, either.
>
>
>>>As far as putting batteries in Ademco wireless transmitters to piss off
>>>ADI...apparently, you don't understand serial numbers.
>>
>>It's a joke jerkoff, I understand the technology more than a two bit
>>jackshit like you does.
>
>
> No, it wasn't a joke.  You just don't know what the fuck you are talking
> about, and are trying to cover up your ignorance.
>
> Let me give you a tip:  if you're going to make a joke, it works better if
> you actually say something funny.  Otherwise, people just assume you're a
> stupid shit.
>
> - badenov
>