[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: difference in quality of equipment: ADT, Brinks, Slomins, etc?

Subject: Re: difference in quality of equipment: ADT, Brinks, Slomins, etc?
From: rogue_petunia@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 19 Mar 2006 07:10:50 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1142390954.079463.312890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Wow, 38 replies and only 1 can be described as even remotely related to
the original post.

Ok, clearly you guys are irritated by non-industry people who ask about
alarms.  If the topic has been discussed before can you at least post
links to the previous discussion.  I did search Google Groups before
posting and didn't successfully find answers. (and by discussed I mean,
really discussed, not 38 replies spiraling into one line cracks and
inside jokes).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: difference in quality of equipment: ADT, Brinks, Slomins, etc?
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: difference in quality of equipment: ADT, Brinks, Slomins, etc?
  - From: Davey Crokett
- Re: difference in quality of equipment: ADT, Brinks, Slomins, etc?
  - From: I'm PINK!

References:
- difference in quality of equipment: ADT, Brinks, Slomins, etc?
  - From: rogue_petunia

Prev by Message: Re: Google, Yahoo, bAss, and cash
Next by Message: Re: Vista-20P
Previous by thread: Re: difference in quality of equipment: ADT, Brinks, Slomins, etc?
Next by thread: Re: difference in quality of equipment: ADT, Brinks, Slomins, etc?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home