[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: NetworX Panel Failures
"Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Y8idncFFb9NviJPZnZ2dnUVZ_vydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Karl Magnus" <magnus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:8T8Pf.4688$l7.2420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Russell Brill wrote:
>> > Starting to see the same crap quality with the old Sentrol stuff... I
> got a
>> > bad PI6000 last week, the motion was DOA right out of the box... I
>> > can't
>> > remember ever getting anything bad when Sentrol's name was on the
>> > box...
> It
>> > looks like GE dropped the price on the old Sentrol line by cutting
> corners
>> > on quality. When are the suits going to learn, short term gain can
>> > equal
>> > long term disaster............
>> >
>>
>> GE is dropping more that just the price these days. Soon, some product
>> lines will be completely gone. The QC that used to be mandatory, is now
>> done on a "when we have the resources available" basis.
>>
>> Yuck.
>
> That makes sense tho, why carry the Concord when they have the Networx
> brand?
>
>
I thought they wanted to kill the Networx line and keep the ITI stuff???
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home