Re: Can a Napco system & DSL connection co-exist?

["FIRETEK" <firetech(change-the-ch-to-k)@telus.net>]

You're splitting hairs.  I've noticed this is a popular pursuit in this
Newsgroup.  Chances are remote that any thief is going to rip out the wires
for the DSL modem if he's after the computer.  The only thing plugged into
the computer at this point is the network cable to the modem.  A short here
won't affect the phone line.

Regards,

Frank

"petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:k8RUf.20571$%N6.293612@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Frank be careful,if the line is split in any ways before the alarm
> panel,there is a possibility that if this splice get shorted or whatever
the
> alarm panel wont be able to call the central station...
>
> the only correct way to connect a line to an alarm panel is using a rj31x
at
> the demark point and then feeding from there the rest of the house..
>
> lets say that the theft that just came in got to the computer of the house
> first,before the entry delay end,and rip the DSL modem from the desk and
> doing so short the phone line,what will happen? what will you say to your
> assurance company?
>
>
> "FIRETEK" <firetech(change-the-ch-to-k)@telus.net> a écrit dans le message
> de news: DwKUf.1669$B_1.1407@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > If you take a moment to read the OP's post, the connection diagram he
> > supplied is the correct way to terminate an alarm system/dsl modem.  The
> > alarm will be able to communicate status and alarm messages without
> > interfering with the Internet connection.  Mr. Bass is correct in this
> > instance.   The OP doesn't need to purchase the extra filter.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Frank
> >
> > "grabbitt" <sn@xxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:AZ1Uf.339$yn4.303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> "Robert L Bass" <sales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:ped022lq0sd2rdt8curp7iabt17uqltmt4@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Wrong advice.  The gentleman is trying to make sure his DSL
> >> > doesn't go down during Napco's transmission.  The plug-in DSL
> >> > filter will not work for him.
> >> >
> >> >> You can also purchase these online.
> >> >
> >> > I sell them online but this gentleman doesn't need one.  He's
> >> > better off using the split filter arrangement.
> >>
> >>
> >> your age is really starting to show in your posts these last few years.
> > Or
> >> is it just that you haven't actually done any low voltage work in many
> >> years.  Or is it that you just are a bullsh---er at heart.  Or are you
> > just
> >> trying to sound like you are important, or are you just trying to
disrupt
> >> the GROUP?
> >> Here is cut and paste from Excelsus Technologies website, makers of the
> >> device I recommended.
> >>
> >>            Z-A431PJ31X-A Alarm Panel DSL Filter (RJ31X)
> >>
> >>             Description
> >>             Designed specifically for homes with alarm systems, the
> >> Z-A431PJ31X-A alarm filter keeps DSL service, home phoneline networking
> >> (HPN) and alarm systems functioning as they should. The alarm filter
> > blocks
> >> DSL and HPN signals from interfering with the alarm system's voice-band
> >> modem. At the same time, it isolates DSL and HPN equipment from alarm
> >> equipment impedances. With this two-way protection, the alarm filter
> >> keeps
> >> the alarm system operating reliably around the clock and ensures fast,
> >> uninterrupted DSL and HPN access even while the alarm system is
dialing.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>             Notice how it states that the DSL stays up while alarm
system
> >> communicates.  Now what was that you said about "wrong advice"?  Did
you
> >> mean your advice was wrong?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>