[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rokonet versus GE

Subject: Re: Rokonet versus GE
From: "gevetri" <gevetri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 15 Dec 2006 06:58:40 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1165845958.612197.66430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fllfh.10292$yj1.58@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165916522.304824.114120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <rfydnaV4y5RU2uLYnZ2dnUVZ_tunnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1166015268.304849.317210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <zPmdnT0bFK3JOB3YnZ2dnUVZ_qqrnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>

How good are these units at transmitting through concrete?  My house is
two story reinforced concerete.  Max line of sight distance between
detector and control panel is about 30 ft.  Walls and floors are 8"
thick.  The detectors I want to use are ITI 60-511-01-95.

Mark Leuck wrote:
> I know which model you were talking about and oddly enough even on that one
> they have a version with 1 lithium battery instead of the normal 2
> alkalines, I've run into them several times and GE doesn't seem to mention
> them

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: Robert L Bass
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: Mark Leuck

References:
- Rokonet versus GE
  - From: gevetri
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: gevetri
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: gevetri
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: Mark Leuck

Prev by Message: Re: XTB, reliablity, etc.
Next by Message: Re: Rokonet versus GE
Previous by thread: Re: Rokonet versus GE
Next by thread: Re: Rokonet versus GE
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home