[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rokonet versus GE

Subject: Re: Rokonet versus GE
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 18:20:31 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1165845958.612197.66430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fllfh.10292$yj1.58@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1165916522.304824.114120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"gevetri" <gevetri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1165916522.304824.114120@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Jim Rojas wrote:
> > I would go with ITI because they offer a broad range of wireless
devices.
> > The Simon 3 is small, and easy to operate.
> >
> > Jim Rojas
>
>
> What I did not like about ITI is their motion detectors are outfitted
> with 1-1.5V alkaline battery while the Rokonet units are 3V lithiums.

No they do make motions with lithium batteries, several in fact

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: gevetri

References:
- Rokonet versus GE
  - From: gevetri
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: Jim Rojas
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: gevetri

Prev by Message: Re: remote interference in a wireless security system
Next by Message: Re: Rokonet versus GE
Previous by thread: Re: Rokonet versus GE
Next by thread: Re: Rokonet versus GE
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home