[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Rokonet versus GE

Subject: Re: Rokonet versus GE
From: "gevetri" <gevetri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 12 Dec 2006 01:42:02 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1165845958.612197.66430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fllfh.10292$yj1.58@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Jim Rojas wrote:
> I would go with ITI because they offer a broad range of wireless devices.
> The Simon 3 is small, and easy to operate.
>
> Jim Rojas


What I did not like about ITI is their motion detectors are outfitted
with 1-1.5V alkaline battery while the Rokonet units are 3V lithiums.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: Mark Leuck

References:
- Rokonet versus GE
  - From: gevetri
- Re: Rokonet versus GE
  - From: Jim Rojas

Prev by Message: Re: Rokonet versus GE
Next by Message: Re: Rokonet versus GE
Previous by thread: Re: Rokonet versus GE
Next by thread: Re: Rokonet versus GE
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home