[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: ADT may come knocking...

Subject: Re: ADT may come knocking...
From: J. <jsloud2001<removeme>@netscape.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2006 19:08:08 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1165058248.160283.261430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <z52dh.49$YN1.27@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <rve9n2dlhdihj1q5kd7btk4bn5eln304ai@xxxxxxx> <us3dh.3578$gj2.2072@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Mon, 4 Dec 2006 16:55:55 -0800, "Doug" <not@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>So let me get this straight, its OK for you to voice your less than
>complimentary opinion about his website, but its not OK for him to voice a
>less than complimentary opinion about ADT?
>
>How's that work then?
>
>Doug

I actually offered a couple words of advice.  There's a big difference
between calling his website a craphole (all links are 404) and him
describing ADT as "automatic death trap."  That's blatant libel that
can be traced directly to him in a newsgroup that functions to provide
electronic security advice to industry professionals and end users.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ADT may come knocking...
  - From: alarman

References:
- ADT may come knocking...
  - From: Chad Speer
- Re: ADT may come knocking...
  - From: Matthew Stanley
- Re: ADT may come knocking...
  - From: J .
- Re: ADT may come knocking...
  - From: Doug

Prev by Message: Re: cell phone dialing
Next by Message: Re: The most realistic dummy CCTV security camera... ever!
Previous by thread: Re: ADT may come knocking...
Next by thread: Re: ADT may come knocking...
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home