Re: Christians, Jews, or Other: Which are the Best Alarm People?

["Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Optional" <fillingtheform@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:52k3421k310b6hf5b07im03ltrchli7b7p@xxxxxxxxxx
> RL Bass  wrote:
> >>One of Bush's ambassadors to a Middle Eastern nation referred to
> >>Muslims last week as "Islamicists" (he pronounced it
"Iss-lahm-iss-issts")
> >>during an interview on the Fox Republican Propaganda Network.
> >> The funny part was that neither the moderator nor anyone else on the
> >>program seemed to think there was anything wrong with the idiot's
comment.
>
> tomas o'le wrote:
>
> >Robert, Robert, Robert...I've ordered from you in the past.
> > Now, because of your stupid political posts, I will take my business
> > else where.
>
> I call Bullshit.
>
> Firstly, tomas o'le: (And what kind of name is that?  It sounds like a
> brand name for tanning lotion.)
>
> You sound like a shill and I find myself suspicious of your veracity
> that you ordered from BassAlarms before.
>
> Secondly: This is a farcical thread that wasn't expected to be taken
> seriously, which so far no one did until you chimed in.   And in
> keeping with the intended tenor, the incident Robert recounts is truly
> funny, is topical from the religion angle, and the political aspect is
> incidental.
>
> Thirdly: Even if you are a Republican...
>
> A.  If you don't realize that the Fox Network is a strongly biased
> propaganda machine than you're IQ cannot be much higher than that of a
> retard, and selling you technical equipment that might require support
> time would probably have a negative expectation.
>
> B.  If you are intelligent enough to recognize that Fox provides
> substantially slanted coverage Fox but won't admit it, then we go back
> to questioning your honesty or your frankness.   And frankness doesn't
> seem to be in short supply with you.
>
> C. If you want to stand by your right not to have to admit that Fox is
> biased, than you are probably such a nit that again, doing business
> with you would probably have a negative expectation.
>
> >Shame Robert you decide you are more "intelligent" that you lose
> >customers with garbage rants.
>
> Fourthly: Nice try, but you can take that guilt trip game and shove it
> where the sun doesn't shine.
>
> Reply Welcome.

RLB has another alias I see