Re: 20P Question

["petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx>]

"Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit dans le message de news:
s1ZRe.355398$s54.265727@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "petem" <petem001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:ymWRe.30131$sY6.356403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> He did the only thing he is good at...
>>
>> And i got over my limit...
>
>
> He's good at what he does, but trust me...  Getting into a "flame fest"
> with him will only diminish you.  I'd decided several months ago that the
> things I was saying to (and about) him did not reflect well on me.  I'm
> not the sort of person that would tell someone off like this regardless of
> how big a jerk (or idiot) they are.  I simply don't associate with people
> that are known liars or who hold the industry in such utter contempt, both
> of which Robert has demonstrated more than once.  These days I'm
> restricting myself to pointing out Robert's lies, mistakes, and
> mis-informed opinions by asking him to verify (back up) what he says.
> Believe me, you'll feel better dealing with him this way and you'll
> accomplish a whole lot more than getting down into the mud with him.  His
> reputation in Usenet is so well known (and Google is our friend).
>
> Would you like an apple pie with that, eh?  (From your friendly Canadian
> coutner clerk)
Humm an apple pie....ok I'll take one!!  LOL

You know this make sense..

But in a way I already started to forget about him..

being in my plonk list I wont see his stuff too much...

But this idea of asking for clarification on his lies is a pretty good
move..
I'll think about it for a few days and maybe I will start something like
it..

after all showing to the new user here what he really is..(a p o s
successfully acting as a prick..;-)
will do more good....then flame