Re: Definition of Subscriber?

["Crash Gordon" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well, not really. They're not treated as incidents...and if you delay the
transmission and stagger the timing it's no more an overload than daily test
signals.


"R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:PLqdnScUuvbvQdjeRVn-vQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Yes, another good reason! I'm sure there are a few more as well.
|
| I have to wonder though about the wholesale sending of AC failures to the
| station which seems to be the default mode that a lot of installers /
| alarmcos use. Surely doing this only serves to block the receivers during
| major power failures to any real alarm signals that might be coming
through.
| Or perhaps the stations have a way to filter all these useless signals to
| leave their receivers clear ? Either way, it still seems like a lot of
| useless traffic for nothing...
|
| RHC
|
|
| "JW" <golf4nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| news:BQk1f.621$Ue7.235@xxxxxxxxxxx
| >
| > "R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
| > news:ItCdnTm6L7jyW9jeRVn-qg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
| >> Ok, those have got to be the ONLY reasons I've heard that make any
sense
| >> to
| >> me...
| >>
| >> RHC
| >
| >
| > We have a lot of systems in vacation homes - they want to know if the
| > power goes out so they can have someone check the premises.
| >
|
|