[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 5010 Communication Problems

Subject: Re: 5010 Communication Problems
From: "alarman" <alarman2000@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:11:27 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <rQo1f.9421$yS6.9358@clgrps12> <QXs1f.7$xe3.4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f_u1f.367$o93.312@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fYI1f.2225$S4.1131@edtnps84> <GdOdndd8-eehVdreRVn-sw@xxxxxxxxxxx> <crF2f.21953$ir4.19581@edtnps90>

"shady" <sh@xxxxxx> wrote in message news:crF2f.21953$ir4.19581@xxxxxxxxxxx
> "Mark Leuck" wrote...
> >
> > Wouldn't be too secure if you could do that
> >
> >
>
> Why wouldn't it be?  It would be at least as secure as the master code
> anyway.  And if you already have that... the system is pretty much all
yours
> anyway.
>
> What I don't find secure is programming codes into Simon systems and it
> tells you the code verbally.  I try not to do much programming if there's
> anyone home, or at least in the room.

If you're really interested in security...why are you using  a Simon anyway?
js

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 5010 Communication Problems
  - From: shady

References:
- 5010 Communication Problems
  - From: shady
- Re: 5010 Communication Problems
  - From: Norm Mugford
- Re: 5010 Communication Problems
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: 5010 Communication Problems
  - From: shady
- Re: 5010 Communication Problems
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: 5010 Communication Problems
  - From: shady

Prev by Message: Re: Datalogger to Test False Alarms on Sensor
Next by Message: Re: I just got my first cell phone!
Previous by thread: Re: 5010 Communication Problems
Next by thread: Re: 5010 Communication Problems
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home