[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?

Subject: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
From: Frank Olson <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2005 00:13:31 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1132962065.435105.236940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <H8Phf.64$fO3.8352@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0CPhf.625211$tl2.260807@pd7tw3no> <5A_hf.2$%23.211@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <HZ%hf.623307$oW2.512544@pd7tw1no> <mV2if.4215$LO4.204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dj6if.626959$oW2.534570@pd7tw1no> <Xieif.5408$Cj5.2351@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

BIG NIGE wrote:


> thanks for the link Frank  (Will have a browse when time allows)

You're welcome.  I think you'll find their PIR's are superior to
anything else you've been using.

References:
- PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Total nerd
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: BIG NIGE
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: BIG NIGE

Prev by Message: Re: Keeping up with Cables in new installation
Next by Message: Re: Napco Magnum 900 False Alarms - Fire
Previous by thread: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
Next by thread: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home