[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?

Subject: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
From: Frank Olson <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:18:36 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1132962065.435105.236940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <H8Phf.64$fO3.8352@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Crash Gordon wrote:
> Are you talking about Pulse count?...that's not quite the same as two trips.
>
> I use pulse count all the time, the count I set it at depends on the
> conditions of the room, harshness of the evironment, dogs, kids, mirrors,
> fans, fax machines, heat/cooling ducts etc.


You're still using detectors that use "pulse-count"??  *Gasp!*

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Beachcomber
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: BIG NIGE

References:
- PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Total nerd
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Crash Gordon

Prev by Message: Napco HA eprom version
Next by Message: Re: Keeping up with Cables in new installation
Previous by thread: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
Next by thread: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home