[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?

Subject: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
From: Frank Olson <Use_the_email_links@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 16:23:03 GMT
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1132962065.435105.236940@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <H8Phf.64$fO3.8352@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0CPhf.625211$tl2.260807@pd7tw3no> <5A_hf.2$%23.211@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Crash Gordon wrote:
> yah...why what do you mean, whats wrong with pulse counts?


Two words:  "Go Digital".  :-)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: BIG NIGE

References:
- PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Total nerd
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
  - From: Crash Gordon

Prev by Message: Re: It's me
Next by Message: Re: ARE YOU REALLY BEING MONITORED? READ THIS
Previous by thread: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
Next by thread: Re: PIR's: Why trip on two detects?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home