[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Moose

Subject: Re: Moose
From: "ABLE_1" <able1no@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 15:13:06 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <5-2dnVzUfKlkHhXenZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Hl7if.116$Cm5.1474@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <65WdnYD3jNRDixTenZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <K6ednXj3eLWa2hTenZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <dwhif.22621$xu.1374@fed1read01> <Ft-dneip36MwSxTeRVn-ig@xxxxxxxxxxx> <hImif.22639$xu.16818@fed1read01> <v-udnW_iV4xrZRTeRVn-uw@xxxxxxxxxx> <bVmif.632296$1i.91501@pd7tw2no> <9qGdnbqkrulknhfeRVn-sA@xxxxxxxxxxx> <L7KdnVxMi6s6kBfenZ2dnUVZ_vmdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> Can a side observer really do a side by side comparison?


                             Yes



>> However if you place the Moose panel against a ATT 8000 they it can be a
>> different story.
>
> Of COURSE it would be a different story, anyone with half a brain knows
> the
> mostly plastic case of the AT&T 8000 removes any possibility of it of ever
> being a boat anchor!

I believe that the "plastic" acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) and is
hydroscopic
therefore will not float.  The circuit board components would also help keep
it down.

Les [stepping to the side]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moose
  - From: Mark Leuck

References:
- Moose
  - From: Rich
- Re: Moose
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Moose
  - From: Rich
- Re: Moose
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Moose
  - From: alarman
- Re: Moose
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Moose
  - From: alarman
- Re: Moose
  - From: R.H.Campbell
- Re: Moose
  - From: Frank Olson
- Re: Moose
  - From: ABLE_1
- Re: Moose
  - From: Mark Leuck

Prev by Message: to Norm Mugford
Next by Message: Getting ready to start over...
Previous by thread: Re: Moose
Next by thread: Re: Moose
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home