[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Moose

Subject: Re: Moose
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 13:44:21 -0600
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <5-2dnVzUfKlkHhXenZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Hl7if.116$Cm5.1474@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <65WdnYD3jNRDixTenZ2dnUVZ_tadnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <K6ednXj3eLWa2hTenZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx> <dwhif.22621$xu.1374@fed1read01> <Ft-dneip36MwSxTeRVn-ig@xxxxxxxxxxx> <hImif.22639$xu.16818@fed1read01> <v-udnW_iV4xrZRTeRVn-uw@xxxxxxxxxx>

"R.H.Campbell" <rh.campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:v-udnW_iV4xrZRTeRVn-uw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hey guys, what exactly was wrong with Moose panels that made them such a
> liability. I have never programmed one, but I have removed many in the
> process of upgrading customers to newer equipment, and they appear to have
> been well made units for the decade when they were common.
>
> Did they have DSC- like bugs in their firmware; did they false or go
runaway
> on occasion??.....what exactly was wrong with them to give them "boat
anchor
> status"...:)))
>
> Thanks !
>
> RHC

Oh sure they only LOOKED well made but deep down......boat anchors

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moose
  - From: Rich

References:
- Moose
  - From: Rich
- Re: Moose
  - From: Crash Gordon
- Re: Moose
  - From: Rich
- Re: Moose
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Moose
  - From: alarman
- Re: Moose
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: Moose
  - From: alarman
- Re: Moose
  - From: R.H.Campbell

Prev by Message: Re: Glue Test in Cold Weather
Next by Message: Re: Warning To Those Considering A Home Security Alarm System
Previous by thread: Re: Moose
Next by thread: Re: Moose
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home