[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: CO ALARM PROCEDURES

Subject: Re: CO ALARM PROCEDURES
From: "Jim" <alarminex@xxxxxxx>
Date: 2 Nov 2005 18:01:31 -0800
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <8Sw9f.2847$Nr6.75@xxxxxxxx><f9adnYORNpk3-freRVn-jw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <dOCdnWnR_fqc9_reRVn-3Q@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <JsOdnfR2VcPGi_XeRVn-rw@xxxxxxxxxxx> <cLqdncA8A7y5RPXeRVn-uw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <8eWdnUaK0aLWffXeRVn-tg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <Wndaf.389036$1i.49392@pd7tw2no>

Frank Olson wrote:
>
> ULC requires we "reward" the canary after testing with it's choice of lite
> beer...  That probably explains the funny walk...

You don't think it's because of the snow shoes?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CO ALARM PROCEDURES
  - From: Frank Olson

References:
- Re: CO ALARM PROCEDURES
  - From: Jackcsg
- Re: CO ALARM PROCEDURES
  - From: Doug L
- Re: CO ALARM PROCEDURES
  - From: Mark Leuck
- Re: CO ALARM PROCEDURES
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: CO ALARM PROCEDURES
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: CO ALARM PROCEDURES
  - From: Frank Olson

Prev by Message: Re: Radionics D7212B1 Panel Help
Next by Message: Re: Commercial Alarm - help
Previous by thread: Re: CO ALARM PROCEDURES
Next by thread: Re: CO ALARM PROCEDURES
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home