Re: Newbie Question: basic system with wireless keypad

[Crash Gordon® <NONE@xxxxxxxx>]

Just trying to get a handle on his syntax...or lack thereof...also will =
not be translatable (is that a word?) by whatever mechanical translator =
he's using :-)


"Bob Worthy" <securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message =
news:ysrde.151255$vL3.101067@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> "Crash Gordon=AE" <NONE@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:6uqde.313$d05.906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Easy. It same for reason we know it all because mother of you head =
drop on
> concrete young when, providing insanity clause for you and likey her =
when
> for technical reason it is needed not just the fax jax.
>=20
> HeHeHe! You lookin to screw the poor guy up more than he already is?? =
What a
> hoot.
>=20
>=20
> <-pull@shoot> wrote in message
> news:00mb719intelle8ctbc711qb28hesg176b@xxxxxxxxxx
> > On Sun, 01 May 2005 23:40:42 +0200, -pull@shoot wrote:
> >
> > >> As you noticed nobody in this group recommended you to purchase =
from
> > >> Radio Shack!
> > >> Just ask then "WHY" they say its crap and what technical
> > >> specifications allow them to say it is?
> > >> Why is theyre recommended system better, where did they get the
> > >> technical specification from to justify theyre reply OR is it =
just
> > >> because they don't sell the system you are looking for who allow =
them
> > >> to say that they don't like your choice?
> >
> > >Because you couldn't compare the unsupervised components in the =
alarm
> system
> > >you "purshased" (which is no longer available) and a fully =
supervised
> > >wireless system like the "Visonic PowerMax" to begin with.
> >
> > and the other even stupid answers. They have no spec but find that..
> >  Supervision exist since years to detect battery low, tamper.. did =
you
> > really not know that?
> >  BUT was the discussion not about Radio Shack sold equipment YOU
> > qualified to be "crap" without any technical argument and
> > specification data? WHY?
> >
>=20
>=20
>