Re: 15. Wired / Wireless alarm systems?

[-pull@shoot]

Thanks Softy for the FUTURE flavor you explained.
 No other comment.

On Sat, 28 May 2005 10:36:01 GMT, "Softy" <jimveal001@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>What?. I saw them at IFSEC. I was there. I was shown them. They exist.
>Period. I'm not about to sit here trying to 'convince' you that they exist.
>They do. live with it.
>
>The transceiver based systems I saw were on 868 although I seem to remember
>at least one that came in 424 or 868Mhz flavors.
>
>Paul, I have no desire to get into an argument with you. If you do not
>believe me then that's that. I know this year will see quite a few
>transceiver based alarm panels coming onto the market as I saw then
>showcased at IFSEC. Whether they are available today I don't know. I just
>know that they exist. I will be proven correct. As to what brands...I can't
>remember. I'll enquire and post back.
>
>
>
>
><-pull@shoot> wrote in message
>news:un8f91d737t67vps4pq2di1fsf5ooh0ltt@xxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Easy give brand and type so that i can believe you.
>>
>> Tel also at what frequency this equipment is operating on.
>>
>> I'm wondering...
>>
>> On Fri, 27 May 2005 05:55:56 GMT, "Softy" <jimveal001@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Domestic bi-directional is existing and is allowed in the UK. I saw
>>>several
>>>systems at IFSEC this year.
>>>
>>><-pull@shoot> wrote in message
>>>news:lk5d915tn2d1flcufjnqd11gn3nedl9ioh@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>> On Thu, 26 May 2005 20:19:03 GMT, "Softy" <jimveal001@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Almost correct. You have negated to mention 2-way wireless systems where
>>>>>both the panel and the detection devices are both transmitters &
>>>>>receivers.
>>>>>RFI jamming is correctly detected and the better systems only report
>>>>>jamming
>>>>>when it knows that a detector signal has been jammed.
>>>>
>>>> True what you say BUT bidirectional handshake wireless alarm systems
>>>> for non specific professioan applications is NOT EXISTING (nor
>>>> allowed).
>>>
>>
>