[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 15. Wired / Wireless alarm systems?



Don't bother trying to have a normal conversation, or justify anything =
with Paulie the Parrot...he's an idiot and doesn't have a clue what he's =
copy/pasting. He only posts stuff when his high on his medications =
anyway.


"Softy" <jimveal001@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message =
news:lQXle.1754$Mi4.1065@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> What?. I saw them at IFSEC. I was there. I was shown them. They exist. =

> Period. I'm not about to sit here trying to 'convince' you that they =
exist.=20
> They do. live with it.
>=20
> The transceiver based systems I saw were on 868 although I seem to =
remember=20
> at least one that came in 424 or 868Mhz flavors.
>=20
> Paul, I have no desire to get into an argument with you. If you do not =

> believe me then that's that. I know this year will see quite a few=20
> transceiver based alarm panels coming onto the market as I saw then=20
> showcased at IFSEC. Whether they are available today I don't know. I =
just=20
> know that they exist. I will be proven correct. As to what brands...I =
can't=20
> remember. I'll enquire and post back.
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> <-pull@shoot> wrote in message=20
> news:un8f91d737t67vps4pq2di1fsf5ooh0ltt@xxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Easy give brand and type so that i can believe you.
> >
> > Tel also at what frequency this equipment is operating on.
> >
> > I'm wondering...
> >
> > On Fri, 27 May 2005 05:55:56 GMT, "Softy" <jimveal001@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>Domestic bi-directional is existing and is allowed in the UK. I saw=20
> >>several
> >>systems at IFSEC this year.
> >>
> >><-pull@shoot> wrote in message
> >>news:lk5d915tn2d1flcufjnqd11gn3nedl9ioh@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>> On Thu, 26 May 2005 20:19:03 GMT, "Softy" <jimveal001@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Almost correct. You have negated to mention 2-way wireless systems =
where
> >>>>both the panel and the detection devices are both transmitters &
> >>>>receivers.
> >>>>RFI jamming is correctly detected and the better systems only =
report
> >>>>jamming
> >>>>when it knows that a detector signal has been jammed.
> >>>
> >>> True what you say BUT bidirectional handshake wireless alarm =
systems
> >>> for non specific professioan applications is NOT EXISTING (nor
> >>> allowed).
> >>
> >=20
>=20
>


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home