Re: 15. Wired / Wireless alarm systems?

[Crash Gordon® <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Would that be; vanilla, chocolate, or strawberry?,,,,or in your case; =
Lithium, Zoloft, or Thalidimide?



<-pull@shoot> wrote in message =
news:vtoh911ooco2qflsn59hg4vtgagium8qc8@xxxxxxxxxx
>=20
> Thanks Softy for the FUTURE flavor you explained.
>  No other comment.
>=20
> On Sat, 28 May 2005 10:36:01 GMT, "Softy" <jimveal001@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>=20
> >What?. I saw them at IFSEC. I was there. I was shown them. They =
exist.=20
> >Period. I'm not about to sit here trying to 'convince' you that they =
exist.=20
> >They do. live with it.
> >
> >The transceiver based systems I saw were on 868 although I seem to =
remember=20
> >at least one that came in 424 or 868Mhz flavors.
> >
> >Paul, I have no desire to get into an argument with you. If you do =
not=20
> >believe me then that's that. I know this year will see quite a few=20
> >transceiver based alarm panels coming onto the market as I saw then=20
> >showcased at IFSEC. Whether they are available today I don't know. I =
just=20
> >know that they exist. I will be proven correct. As to what brands...I =
can't=20
> >remember. I'll enquire and post back.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ><-pull@shoot> wrote in message=20
> >news:un8f91d737t67vps4pq2di1fsf5ooh0ltt@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> Easy give brand and type so that i can believe you.
> >>
> >> Tel also at what frequency this equipment is operating on.
> >>
> >> I'm wondering...
> >>
> >> On Fri, 27 May 2005 05:55:56 GMT, "Softy" <jimveal001@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Domestic bi-directional is existing and is allowed in the UK. I saw =

> >>>several
> >>>systems at IFSEC this year.
> >>>
> >>><-pull@shoot> wrote in message
> >>>news:lk5d915tn2d1flcufjnqd11gn3nedl9ioh@xxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> On Thu, 26 May 2005 20:19:03 GMT, "Softy" <jimveal001@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Almost correct. You have negated to mention 2-way wireless =
systems where
> >>>>>both the panel and the detection devices are both transmitters &
> >>>>>receivers.
> >>>>>RFI jamming is correctly detected and the better systems only =
report
> >>>>>jamming
> >>>>>when it knows that a detector signal has been jammed.
> >>>>
> >>>> True what you say BUT bidirectional handshake wireless alarm =
systems
> >>>> for non specific professioan applications is NOT EXISTING (nor
> >>>> allowed).
> >>>
> >>=20
> >
>