Re: Opinions on alarms systems configured/monitored over IP network

[Crash Gordon® <NONE@xxxxxxxx>]

Shhhhh.
Next you're gonna tell him how freekin' easy they are to program too.


"Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message =
news:Opqdnb01_vuiZKLfRVn-2g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Radionic's will be your most expensive option. You should look at DMP, =
the
> head end will be 2/3 cheaper, and all field equipment will be about =
1/3 the
> cost of Radionic's, plus the product line is backward/forward =
compatible up
> and down the entire product line. No software fees, dongle horse crap, =
or
> expensive monitoring solutions. What you see as $9,100 with Radionic's =
would
> cost under $4K with DMP. I was a Radionic's dealer for 8 years....now =
I
> actually make money, have half the stock. I've been using DMP's =
Network
> Routers for 5 years, and built a Central Station in 2002 totally =
dedicated
> to Internet Monitoring (TCP/IP), with video verification. Been there =
done
> it....
>=20
> "Ranger" <hd_ranger@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:hsL%d.717$z.619@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > I, too could use some info on IP monitoring. We are getting ready to
> install
> > a campus-wide network on fiber, along with a 3Com V5000 phone =
system.  I
> am
> > monitoring 63 security/fire panels at present, over our PBX =
(Executone
> IDX),
> > with a Radionics D6500.
> >
> > We are looking at Bosch's NetCom System. To convert,  we will be =
spending
> > close to $40,000 on the equipment, not counting (if needed) new =
automation
> > software (currently SIS Alarm Center).  Although the D6600 and =
license key
> > are not cheap, the bulk of this cost is for the dialer capture =
modules at
> > the panels.
> >
> > Since our present phone system is backed up at the head end by  a =
UPS/nat.
> > gas generator, we are looking at leaving one active copper line to =
each
> > building, as an emergency phone, and have the panels seize that line =
as a
> > backup.  The fiber system  will only  have 8 hours backup for =
switches and
> > phones, and due to our situation (residential treatment facility)  =
that
> > ain't good enough.
> >
> > Does the C900TTL-E dialer capture module support 4 + 2?  (still have =
15
> XL-1
> > panels )
> >
> > What kind of speed can we expect on reporting?
> >
> > Will Alarm Center work with the 6600?
> >
> > Is this a viable long-term solution?
> > Another option is to convert at each end using the new phone system. =
( no
> > prices on that yet)  I would like to get away from my copper lines =
as
> > primary, due to 'issues.'
> >
> > Are the prices I have competitive?  (no decisions made on the =
upgrade yet)
> > D6600 receiver        $4,951.00  (Includes a telephone line card)
> > D6680-E120             $  712.80   network interface
> > D4020                       $  271.20   9000 series capture module
> > C900TTL-E              $  413.60  generic capture module (On orders =
of 50
> or
> > more)
> > D6201-USB            $2,748.90  (Software License dongle)
> >
> > I am slowly gathering answers to these q. and others, but any input =
is
> > appreciated.
> > So many questions, so little time...
> >
> > Rick C.
> > Security Manager, XXX
> > hd_ranger@xxxxxxxxxxx  (sterilize with heat)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "Pat Coghlan" <info@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > news:u8E%d.2591$nK.422856@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > I'm looking for opinions on commercial alarm systems that enable =
alarm
> > > panels to be configured and monitored over an IP network - =
requiring
> > > little or no keypad programming at all.
> > >
> > > I am familiar only with the Summit eNT system by Edwards (formerly
> > > Integrated  Security Solutions), which does both alarm and access
> > > control and allows the panels to be configured from the central =
site - a
> > > hard requirement for me.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance.
> > >
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
>