Re: Anybody else had dealings with Jim Rojas ??

["Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

There you go...that's another good reason why I rescue all the old
crap...cause ya neva know... :)

Jim Rojas


"mikey" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:xL6dnfI2pOyYRj3fRVn-oQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I just threw out a shitload of those Linear extended range antennas with
>the
> ground plane. Within a week of chucking them (after hoarding them for 10
> years in my black hole) I discover they make superb x10 antennae.
>
> "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:uGJne.7593$vK5.6169@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> I earn more income selling used & obsolete items. No middlemen involved.
>>
>> Jim Rojas
>>
>> "mikey" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:16idnaujt9qE_gLfRVn-tQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >I saw this once years ago when I got into an email exchange with
>> >somebody
>> > dealing with Bass. The chap said he didn't want to piss Bass off
>> > because
>> > he
>> > was afraid he wouldn't sell to him anymore. Har har, can you believe
> that?
>> > The guy'd drop ship ANYTHING to ANYBODY.
>> >
>> > I wonder how long it will be before the real distributers start selling
> to
>> > the public. I always thought it was because there was no money in it
>> > but
>> > Bass makes it sound like a goldmine. Doesn't compute.
>> >
>> > In fact... hey Jim, didn't you start a store? And the fish / biker guy,
> oh
>> > yah,
>> > Bob Lalonde, didn't he start one too? What's the scoop, lads? More
> trouble
>> > than it's worth?
>> >
>> >
>> > "Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> > news:pbJne.1544111$8l.1297748@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>
>> >> "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> >> news:44Fne.35069$GN3.18612@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >I found his board and I sent it to him yesterday.
>> >> >
>> >> > Jim Rojas
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I know.  It was mentioned it in a previous post.  My point was:  Why
>> >> would
>> >> anyone here care what another individual thinks or how they happen to
>> >> determine the level of "troll-ness" (for lack of a better word)?...
> For
>> >> instance, it seems to me that Paul doesn't fall into the accepted
> Usenet
>> >> definition of a "troll" anyway...  He's more along the lines of a
> "kook"
>> >> (which probably also describes his real life persona as well)...  :-))
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>