Re: Anybody else had dealings with Jim Rojas ??

["Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I earn more income selling used & obsolete items. No middlemen involved.

Jim Rojas

"mikey" <someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:16idnaujt9qE_gLfRVn-tQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I saw this once years ago when I got into an email exchange with somebody
> dealing with Bass. The chap said he didn't want to piss Bass off because
> he
> was afraid he wouldn't sell to him anymore. Har har, can you believe that?
> The guy'd drop ship ANYTHING to ANYBODY.
>
> I wonder how long it will be before the real distributers start selling to
> the public. I always thought it was because there was no money in it but
> Bass makes it sound like a goldmine. Doesn't compute.
>
> In fact... hey Jim, didn't you start a store? And the fish / biker guy, oh
> yah,
> Bob Lalonde, didn't he start one too? What's the scoop, lads? More trouble
> than it's worth?
>
>
> "Frank Olson" <feolson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:pbJne.1544111$8l.1297748@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "Jim Rojas" <jrojas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:44Fne.35069$GN3.18612@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >I found his board and I sent it to him yesterday.
>> >
>> > Jim Rojas
>>
>>
>> I know.  It was mentioned it in a previous post.  My point was:  Why
>> would
>> anyone here care what another individual thinks or how they happen to
>> determine the level of "troll-ness" (for lack of a better word)?...  For
>> instance, it seems to me that Paul doesn't fall into the accepted Usenet
>> definition of a "troll" anyway...  He's more along the lines of a "kook"
>> (which probably also describes his real life persona as well)...  :-))
>>
>>
>
>