[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: 43. VICTIMS of wireless alarm systems

Subject: Re: 43. VICTIMS of wireless alarm systems
From: "Mark Leuck" <m..leuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 22:56:45 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <h4mlb1tjd1m3c3dqnjcqfm2lb6hbmkdbqi@xxxxxxx> <Fkkve.31$5J6.10549@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <8j5sb1p6oov76b023o8tp4nl5bt9dbq5op@xxxxxxx> <Chpve.107$I96.41518@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

It would be a first if he did

"Crash Gordon®" <webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Chpve.107$I96.41518@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
And you are incapable of answering a direct question, aren't  you?

Moral satisfaction? What the fxk are you trying to say?

ANSWER the questions udumfreekazoid

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 43. VICTIMS of wireless alarm systems
  - From: Crash Gordon®

References:
- 43. VICTIMS of wireless alarm systems
  - From: -pull
- Re: 43. VICTIMS of wireless alarm systems
  - From: Crash Gordon®
- Re: 43. VICTIMS of wireless alarm systems
  - From: -pull
- Re: 43. VICTIMS of wireless alarm systems
  - From: Crash Gordon®

Prev by Message: Re: Advice on sensors, please
Next by Message: Re: Ademco programming
Previous by thread: Re: 43. VICTIMS of wireless alarm systems
Next by thread: Re: 43. VICTIMS of wireless alarm systems
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home