Re: 43. VICTIMS of wireless alarm systems

[-pull@shoot]

Expected that elementary answer quite some time.
You are satisfied with your system, good.
Your moral satisfaction is important to you but only to you.


On Sat, 25 Jun 2005 14:50:02 -0700, Crash Gordon®
<webmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Just tested mine...works fine...always does.
>
>www.mipot.com  WHAT PAGE ARE YOU REFERRING TO
>http://www.aurel.it/  WHAT PAGE ARE YOU REFERRING TO
>www.rfsolutions.co.uk  WHAT PAGE ARE YOU REFERRING TO
>
>I'd love to try to follow your reasoning but the above pages don't relate to any of your statements - can you be more specific.
>
>Also, how, in your opinion should I be testing my wireless alarms?
>
>I defer to your superior knowledge on this subject and would like your opinion on how to properly test (specifically) - since you have so much time to rant...you must have time to educate us in your method of testing. Your previous attempts have fallen far short being specific.
>
>
>
><-pull@shoot> wrote in message news:h4mlb1tjd1m3c3dqnjcqfm2lb6hbmkdbqi@xxxxxxxxxx
>|
>| Are you an old or a new VICTIM of wireless alarm systems wrong
>| advertisements and sellers talk?
>|
>| Wireless alarm systems fail during Radio Frequency Interferences (RFI)
>| without warning to the owner and nothing can prevent RFI.
>|
>| TEST YOURS if you have one...
>|
>| :For all frequency types of wireless alarm systems:
>|
>|
>|  You don't believe me?
>|  Test it or ask so called professionals to explain you why
>|  wireless alarm systems are reliable and how they avoid the
>|  well known nuisances of RFI.
>|
>|