Re: UL Required to get License

["Bob Worthy" <securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Testing and inspecting needs licensing and the real catch was that, it was
for compensation under a contract. This puts UL into the contracting
business no matter how one might twist and turn it. Something Robert could
never get through his head. UL tried to say what they were doing was having
the fire inspector test/inspect the system. Records showed the fire
department was usually not always present. Even if the fire department was
the ones doing the testing/inspecting, the law says "by or through others".
When they didn't win that argument, they tried to tell the state that what
they were doing was an audit. To late, the state said they can call it what
ever they want to call it, they are charging money under a contract to do
it, so if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck and they are
collecting money to do it, they need a license.

<mbbaker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1133898322.200818.271990@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Gotcha.  It's common to see licensing required of persons testing but
> not for those inspecting.  Apparently Florida requires licensing for
> either.
>