Re: UL Required to get License

["Norm Mugford" <1alarm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

<robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1134468453.949527.118210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>  Hey Bass, tell us again about that "central station" you had in your
>> house in Connecticut. That WAS a UL listed central station, wasn't it?
>
> Nope.  I never needed a UL listing.  But it was fun getting your
> Worthless pal all defensive, especially after the crap he's said about
> me.
>
>> Or was that too much of a commitment to standards for your taste?
>
> Yep.  The fact is that all but a handful of installations by UL listed
> alarm companies meet UL standards.  For most the UL certificate is just
> a marketing gimick.  If you want to install commercial fire alarm
> systems for a living, you really should go for the UL listing.  The
> same applies if you want to bid on banks and such.  Most government
> contracts don't require it (or at least they didn't up to 5 years ago
> when I sold my alarm company).
>
> If it bothers you when I put one of your pals on the defensive that's a
> plus.
>

Mr. Bass....You might want to check the UL central station
you recommend to all your DIY residential customers, the one
that's on your web-sites.
They're not UL listed for residential.....They only have a UUFX
listing, that's not residential my friend.....CVSU is Residential
Monitoring.

So are you are misleading your customers again, eh..Mr. BAss.
Or, are your speaking about something you know nothing about, as
usual.......

Before you run of the mouth Mr. Bass....watch out where your foot is.....

Norm Mugford