[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: UL Required to get License

Subject: Re: UL Required to get License
From: "Bob Worthy" <securinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 09:58:14 -0500
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <ay3lf.52865$s92.24258@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1133842645.532477.217800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Luglf.45074$i7.26721@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1133927149.922696.126280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> > I have all the respect in the world for UL as a standards writing entity
and testing laboratory. They are the "Seal of Good Housekeeping" if you
will...

Bubble Butt wrote:
> Uh-huh.  Yet you refuse to bring your company into compliance with
> their standards.

Response to Bubble Butt's useless comment:

You can be in compliance with a standard or code without paying UL a
membership fee. The standard is their for everyone to follow, regardless if
you pay them or not. Sorta like you using everyone elses expertise as your
own, except with the standards thing, it is acceptable and even recommended
and encougaged, oh yes, and there are choices within the code and UL is not
referenced anymore. Wonder why?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: UL Required to get License
  - From: robertlbass

References:
- UL Required to get License
  - From: Bob Worthy
- Re: UL Required to get License
  - From: robertlbass
- Re: UL Required to get License
  - From: Bob Worthy
- Re: UL Required to get License
  - From: robertlbass

Prev by Message: Re: Brinks system, cancelled monitoring service, now no door chime that had before!
Next by Message: Re: Running wire for security cameras, and tips on fishing wire?
Previous by thread: Re: UL Required to get License
Next by thread: Re: UL Required to get License
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home