Re: Surge Protection?

[w_tom <w_tom1@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

  Only demonstrated is that internal electronics protection
protected the electronics.  To prove a point, personal
observation alone and without electronics measuring devices is
not sufficient.  Your evidence alone is only sufficient to
create a hypothesis or speculation.  Without comprehension of
the underlying principles - without even any specification
numbers - your hypothesis cannot become fact.

  Numbers for that AVR were requested and not provided.
Meanwhile I did provide some useful numbers.  Electronics must
work, just fine, even when incandescent lamps dim to less than
40% intensity due to a brownout.  The AVR does not even claim
to maintain 120 volt output when AC mains drop that low.  So
what is the AVR really doing beside enriching APC?

   cctvbahamas example has been used elsewhere previously to
demonstrate internal protection already inside electronics.
Others are warned of a recommendation when numbers cannot even
be provided.  Recommendation without numbers is called 'junk
science'.  The AVR to protect electronics?  cctvbahamasa has
yet to even say why it should work.  Somehow he just knows it
must have provided protection.

cctvbahamas@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> I have proven it here this summer, what i recommended works. End
> of story.
> Guys, add a $30 APC 600 watt Voltage Regulator "at the least",
> to your CCTV system.