[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: CCTV Cameras

Subject: Re: CCTV Cameras
From: "Jackcsg" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 15:57:53 -0400
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <1125088738.040920.255630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <DpydnWtl5tuDPpLeRVn-uQ@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <sradnRqn3vEXIpLeRVn-sQ@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <nKidnfukC5wVQ5LeRVn-jA@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <1125156675.656470.106680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

"Socrates" <londonlinks@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1125156675.656470.106680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Again, other than sitting on a desk next to a laptop, which has next to no
applications in the world of surveillance, could this possibly benefit.

Authorities don't care who has the highest quality image, they care that the
perpetrator is identifiable, and the means capable of intervention. Your
method would be the laughing stock of the professional industry. All you've
proven, is what a complete waste of time your efforts have been. Make it
efficient, and you might be on to something.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Socrates

References:
- CCTV Cameras
  - From: Socrates
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Jackcsg
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Jackcsg
- Re: CCTV Cameras
  - From: Socrates

Prev by Message: Re: Don't forget.. wireless
Next by Message: Re: Down Payments?
Previous by thread: Re: CCTV Cameras
Next by thread: Re: CCTV Cameras
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home