[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]
Re: Attic Smoke Detectors Question
I've never had a problem with 135 degree heats in attics,
in Connecticut or here in Florida.
What experiences have you had that causes you to
recommend a 194 or 200 degree heat?
Norm Mugford
"Robert L. Bass" <robertlbass@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nPWdnQjHppcWUv7fRVn-gA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > I would avoid using a smoke detector in your attic.
> > Too many "dust" and "critter" variables to deal with.
> > I would use a fixed 135 degree heat detector...
>
> Do NOT install a 135ºF fixed temperature or ROR heat detector in an attic.
> It will false. Use either a 194º or 200º detector. Most of my
> installations have been in the northeastern states where 194ºF
rate-of-rise
> (ROR) type detectors are the norm for attics. If you live in the desert
> southwest, you may want to consider using fixed temp heat detectors.
>
> In either case, never use a 145º heat sensor in the attic (unless you
happen
> to live in Alaska).
>
> > Reminder "Heat detectors should only be
> > used when property protection alone is
> > involved".
>
> That much is correct. Heat detectors are not considered life safety
> devices.
>
> --
>
> Regards,
> Robert L Bass
>
> =============================>
> Bass Home Electronics
> 2291 Pine View Circle
> Sarasota · Florida · 34231
> 877-722-8900 Sales & Tech Support
> http://www.bassburglaralarms.com
> =============================>
>
>
alt.security.alarms Main Index |
alt.security.alarms Thread Index |
alt.security.alarms Home |
Archives Home