RE: Changes to Protocol Docs - a Summary

["Ian Lowe" <ian.lowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Yeah same here, I know there's a certain element of rushing ahead here,
but I'm happy that we are talking about a small number of changes that
are fully backward compatible - as Gerry says, we can test the changes
out in our own environments and make sure they are stable.

I.


-----Original Message-----
From: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx [mailto:ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gerry Duprey
Sent: 26 September 2005 02:43
To: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_xpl] Changes to Protocol Docs - a Summary

Howdy,

> Hmm, I'd better do the same to my sdk, then.
>
> So much for summaries and discussions - we all just go ahead and do it

> anyway.  I suppose that means at least the framework developers agree
> on

Well, I think there is some excitement here and what I think we can use
this for in a "hashing out" mode -- those of us who can will
implement
this and see how things work and get along.  We'll just keep watching it
for a while (maybe a month or two) and if things look stable, we can
then look at formalizing it (always better to have some real-world
experience before carving into that stone).

I think that the simplicity of the changes and their
backward-compatibility makes this pretty easy for many of us to test out
and should make it easy to tweak it a bit (if needed) until it settles
down.

I, for one, am pretty pumped about all this :-)

G

--
Gerry Duprey
Ann Arbor, MI 48103
http://www.cdp1802.org



xPL Links: http://www.xplproject.org.uk http://www.xplhal.com
http://www.xpl.myby.co.uk
To Post a Message: ukha_xpl@xxxxxxx
To Subscribe:  ukha_xpl-subscribe@xxxxxxx
To Unsubscribe:  ukha_xpl-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx